I'm one of those idealistic persons that believe that each and every one of us has a soul mate. I don't believe that our soul mate fits perfectly in us, but I do believe that after we meet her, we need to battle for her, I believe that that soul mate won't come running for us instantly after our eyes meet for the first time. And the real problem is when we believe that another person is our soul mate, but that person does not think the same. It's probably one of the most ancient problems in the world, but the answer for it remains as obscure as it was in the beginning. When it comes to heart reasons (or is it brain reasons?), there's not a simple, plane answer and the answer is never the same. So many different endings with the same story, we only need to change the characters, and sometimes not even the characters need changing to change the ending. In the end all we have is a big question mark of what would have happened if we did things differently (and a big certain of what happened if we did things as we did).

My physics teacher believes that we cannot travel trough time, that we cannot experiment two things in the same environment to see which one is the best and then travel a third time to use the best one. And as the only way of experiment in human relationships twice is time travel, we will never know what would be the reaction if the action was different. So here we are with a moral dilemma of knowing that after doing something we cannot “re-do it” but without knowing what will happen if we do something… Complicated? Human relations always are.